Back to Most Recent Posts
October 19, 2006
Thursday Links
- Bud offers a charming man about town piece that touches on the intersection of technology and culture.
- One of my biggest on-the-job challenges back when I was a bookseller was recommending books for finicky teenagers. In an effort to take some of the guesswork out of this endeavor, Anita Silvey, a professor of children's literature at Simmons College in Boston, wrote 500 Great Books for Teens. Scripps news prints 20 of those recommendations, including The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon, A Long Way Down by Nick Hornby, and, of course, The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger.
- Germany is prosecuting seven men for burning a copy of The Diary of Anne Frank, in a case that highlights the symbolic power of books.
- And in Trenton, NJ, librarians are accusing a library accountant of refusing to purchase the novel Whore by Tanika Lynch for the library's collection because "he objected to the title."
- C. Max Magee @ 8:31 AM ~
comments: 3 ~ Links to this post
Writing which elucidates the main themes, foci and/or credentials of a book, is a winner for anyone who loves to read.
But Silvey's book contains 'classics' that are 'Beyond the 500'. Given that the twenty-first century teenager experience is a far cry from a Caulfield, or any of the Cormier / Blume teenagers, is it fair to have books that are 'classics' in this genre, and that are exempt from testing against modern criteria to retain a space on this list?
But Silvey's book contains 'classics' that are 'Beyond the 500'. Given that the twenty-first century teenager experience is a far cry from a Caulfield, or any of the Cormier / Blume teenagers, is it fair to have books that are 'classics' in this genre, and that are exempt from testing against modern criteria to retain a space on this list?
# posted by 
Anonymous @ October 19, 2006 4:05 PM
Anonymous @ October 19, 2006 4:05 PM
Sure. I'd say it's fair. The fact that we still know and discuss these books means they are worthwhile, if only because new readers can join in the broader literary discussion after having the read them. I think that this criteria holds true for any book, teen or otherwise. Plus, if a book weren't worth reading it wouldn't have the staying power to make it on such a list.
That's not to say, however, that all old "classics" should be grandfathered onto all new lists. There's certainly a place for a similar list that includes only newer books, but my impression is that these recommendations are designed to introduce the underacheiving reader to the whole world of good books out there outside of the school context, which, as I've mentioned previously, can lessen kids' enjoyment of very good books.
That's not to say, however, that all old "classics" should be grandfathered onto all new lists. There's certainly a place for a similar list that includes only newer books, but my impression is that these recommendations are designed to introduce the underacheiving reader to the whole world of good books out there outside of the school context, which, as I've mentioned previously, can lessen kids' enjoyment of very good books.
I would like to know how the forum feels about the trend of Adult / Teen overlap. Has it always been the case that the best fiction does show the capacity to leap genres?
I'm also trying to decide how I feel about the attendant snobbery that goes with adults reading teen fiction, with a more mature jacket.
I'm also trying to decide how I feel about the attendant snobbery that goes with adults reading teen fiction, with a more mature jacket.
Sponsor:
